CELPIP reading: getting from 7 to 9

At 7 you usually understand most of what you read. The points you're missing tend to be on questions where two options both look right. This page has 19 questions like that, Parts 3 and 4 of our free Reading Exam 1, with every wrong option explained and named by the trap it uses.

Want an honest score first? Take the whole test timed, then come back.

Correct answers out of 38From the top of level 7 to the bottom of level 9 is 3 more correct answers. From the bottom of 7, it's 7.
038

Ranges from our CELPIP reading score chart. CELPIP doesn't publish exact cut-offs.

Six traps behind the wrong answers

We tagged all 30 wrong options in Part 4, and the 11 Part 3 paragraphs that come close without matching, by how they try to catch you. Once you can name the trap in an option, ruling it out is quick. Each explanation below shows its trap.

  • Not in the textSounds reasonable, but nothing in the passage supports it.
    12
  • The text says the oppositeContradicted by a sentence you can point to.
    9
  • Goes further than the textClose to what the passage says, then one step past it.
    7
  • Same words, different meaningThe option repeats words from the passage but changes what they say.
    6
  • True, but answers a different questionThe passage does say this, just not where the question is pointing.
    6
  • Right idea, wrong personSomeone in the passage holds this view, but not the person asked about.
    1

Part 3 · 9 questions

Reading for Information

Four paragraphs and nine statements. Match each statement to the paragraph that says it, or choose E when no paragraph does. The E questions are the hard ones: a paragraph is on the right topic but never actually makes the claim.

A

The peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) is a cosmopolitan raptor celebrated as the fastest animal on Earth. In its hunting dive, or stoop, it can exceed 300 kilometres per hour. An apex aerial predator, it feeds almost entirely on other birds, which it strikes in mid-flight with a clenched foot. Historically the species inhabited every continent except Antarctica, nesting on high cliff ledges and, occasionally, on tall built structures. Long prized by falconers for its speed and trainability, the peregrine's broad distribution and adaptability made it, until the middle of the twentieth century, a familiar sight across much of North America and Eurasia.

B

In the decades after the Second World War, peregrine populations collapsed across much of their range. Investigators eventually attributed the decline to DDT, a synthetic pesticide that concentrated in the birds' tissues as it moved up the food chain, a process termed bioaccumulation. The compound disrupted the females' calcium metabolism, causing them to lay abnormally thin-shelled eggs that cracked beneath the incubating parent. Reproduction all but ceased. By the early 1970s the peregrine had been extirpated from the entire eastern United States and was regarded as endangered throughout its former territory — a startling reversal of fortune for so widespread and capable a bird.

C

The prohibition of DDT in the early 1970s removed the principal threat, yet the depleted populations could not recover unaided. Conservationists therefore launched ambitious captive-breeding programmes, rearing chicks in incubators and returning them to the wild through hacking, a centuries-old falconry method in which fledglings are gradually acclimatized from an elevated release box. Over roughly two decades, several thousand captive-bred birds were introduced across the continent. The undertaking proved remarkably effective: by 1999 the species had rebounded sufficiently for authorities to remove it from the United States endangered-species list, an outcome few observers had thought possible a single generation earlier.

D

One of the peregrine's most dependable modern strongholds is, improbably, the city. Skyscrapers imitate the sheer cliff ledges the birds instinctively favour, and urban districts teem with pigeons, a plentiful year-round prey. Breeding pairs now raise their young on office towers, bridges, and cathedral spires in dozens of cities, frequently observed by webcams that have turned the falcons into unlikely local celebrities. Some biologists caution that urban living carries hazards of its own, chiefly collisions with glass and traffic, which kill many young birds in their first year. Even so, few dispute that the peregrine's rescue ranks among the signal achievements of twentieth-century conservation.

For each statement, choose paragraph A, B, C or D, or E if no paragraph says it.

  1. 1.The bird can travel faster than any other creature.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer A. Paragraph A: "celebrated as the fastest animal on Earth." "Faster than any other creature" is the same claim in new words.

    • Correct optionA is the answer.
    • BNot in the textB is about the population collapse. Speed is not mentioned.
    • CNot in the textC is about captive breeding and recovery.
    • DNot in the textD is about city living. Nothing about speed.
    • EThe text says the oppositeIt is given, in the first sentence of A.
  2. 2.A pesticide weakened the shells of the birds' eggs.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer B. Paragraph B: DDT "disrupted the females' calcium metabolism, causing them to lay abnormally thin-shelled eggs."

    • ANot in the textA describes the bird before any decline. No pesticide appears.
    • Correct optionB is the answer.
    • CTrue, but answers a different questionC names DDT, but only to say it was banned. The eggshell damage is in B.
    • DNot in the textD covers city hazards like glass and traffic, not pesticides.
    • EThe text says the oppositeB states it directly.
  3. 3.Birds raised by people were slowly returned to the wild.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer C. Paragraph C: fledglings are "gradually acclimatized from an elevated release box." "Gradually" is the "slowly" in the statement.

    • ASame words, different meaningA mentions falconers training the birds, but nothing about returning birds to the wild.
    • BNot in the textB is the decline. No birds are released.
    • Correct optionC is the answer.
    • DTrue, but answers a different questionD is about wild birds that chose cities, not birds people raised.
    • EThe text says the oppositeC describes it in detail.
  4. 4.Tall buildings offer nesting places similar to the birds' natural ones.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer D. Paragraph D: "Skyscrapers imitate the sheer cliff ledges the birds instinctively favour."

    • ASame words, different meaningA says they nested "occasionally, on tall built structures", but it never says buildings are similar to cliffs. That comparison is only in D.
    • BNot in the textB does not discuss nesting sites.
    • CNot in the textC mentions an elevated release box, which is a release method, not a nesting place.
    • Correct optionD is the answer.
    • EThe text says the oppositeD states it.
  5. 5.The species disappeared entirely from one region of a country.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer B. Paragraph B: "extirpated from the entire eastern United States." Extirpated means wiped out in that area.

    • ANot in the textA describes the bird's range before the decline. Nothing disappears.
    • Correct optionB is the answer.
    • CSame words, different meaningC mentions the United States list, but that is the bird being removed from the endangered list, the recovery.
    • DNot in the textD is about where it lives now.
    • EThe text says the oppositeB says it, using a hard word. This is the question that tests whether you know extirpated.
  6. 6.The bird is now more numerous than it was before its decline.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer E. Not given. C says it "rebounded sufficiently" to leave the endangered list, and D calls cities a stronghold. Neither says it is now more numerous than before the decline.

    • ANot in the textA describes numbers before the decline, with nothing to compare against.
    • BNot in the textB is only the decline.
    • CGoes further than the textRecovering enough to leave the endangered list is not the same as passing the old population. This is the classic E trap.
    • DGoes further than the text"Dependable strongholds" and "dozens of cities" say it is doing well, not that it outnumbers its past.
    • Correct optionE is the answer.
  7. 7.Cameras have allowed scientists to study the birds' diet in detail.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer E. Not given. D mentions webcams, but they made the falcons "local celebrities." Nothing says scientists used them to study diet.

    • ATrue, but answers a different questionA says what the birds eat, but no cameras are involved.
    • BNot in the textB has investigators studying DDT, not cameras.
    • CNot in the textC has no cameras.
    • DSame words, different meaningD has the webcams and the pigeons, but links neither to scientists studying diet. Two true details glued into a false one.
    • Correct optionE is the answer.
  8. 8.The falcon captures most of its food while both are in flight.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer A. Paragraph A: "it feeds almost entirely on other birds, which it strikes in mid-flight." Both the falcon and its prey are flying.

    • Correct optionA is the answer.
    • BNot in the textB covers the food chain only to explain how DDT built up.
    • CNot in the textC does not describe hunting.
    • DTrue, but answers a different questionD says pigeons are plentiful prey in cities, but not how they are caught.
    • EThe text says the oppositeA states it.
  9. 9.Living in cities exposes the birds to new kinds of danger.

    Show the answer and why

    Answer D. Paragraph D: "urban living carries hazards of its own, chiefly collisions with glass and traffic."

    • ANot in the textA mentions built structures but no dangers.
    • BSame words, different meaningB is about danger, but from a pesticide, not from city life.
    • CNot in the textC has no city hazards.
    • Correct optionD is the answer.
    • EThe text says the oppositeD states it.

Part 4 · 10 questions

Reading for Viewpoints

An article with several people's views, then a reader's comment with five blanks. The first five questions ask who thinks what. The blanks have to fit both the comment's grammar and what the commenter believes.

The article

The town council is weighing a proposal to replace the grass playing fields at Riverside Park with artificial turf, and residents are sharply divided.

The proposal's strongest advocate is Dana Okonkwo, the town's recreation director. She argues that natural grass simply cannot keep up with demand. "Every spring the fields are closed for weeks because they are too wet, and by August they are worn down to dirt," she says. "A turf field can be played on from morning to night, in almost any weather, without needing time to recover." Okonkwo estimates that turf would roughly triple the available playing hours, easing a chronic shortage that currently forces some youth teams to practise on gravel lots or in the next town over. She adds that turf requires no watering, mowing, or fertilizer, which she says would save the town thousands of dollars a year and conserve water during increasingly dry summers.

Not everyone is persuaded. Helen Voss, a parent and member of a local environmental group, worries the plan trades one problem for several new ones. "On a hot day, a turf field can be twenty degrees warmer than grass — hot enough to burn a child's hands," she says. Voss also points to the tiny rubber pellets used as infill, which wash into storm drains and nearby creeks, and to the expense of replacing the entire surface every eight to ten years. "Grass repairs itself. It just grows back," she says. "We should be fixing the drainage, not paving over a park."

Okonkwo counters that modern infill materials are far cleaner than the recycled-tire crumb used a decade ago, and that better drainage alone would never solve the capacity problem. Voss remains unconvinced, noting that "cleaner is not the same as clean." Ravi Mehta, who coaches two youth soccer teams, sees merit on both sides. "My players would love a field that is always open," he admits, "but I do wonder what we are putting under their feet." The council will hold a public consultation before its vote in the spring.

A reader's comment

As a former groundskeeper who's watched this debate in three towns, I think both women are partly right. Okonkwo is correct that overused grass fields 6 — I've closed plenty of them after a wet spring. But Voss's worry about heat is no exaggeration; I've measured turf surfaces that were genuinely 7 on a July afternoon. What frustrates me is that the discussion keeps treating this as 8, when the right answer usually depends on the individual field. A shaded field that drains well may do fine as grass; a swampy, overbooked one may not. Before spending a fortune, the council should 9, rather than commit to one surface everywhere. That way they could 10 instead of simply guessing.

  1. 10.Okonkwo's main argument for turf is that ...

    1. Ait is cheaper to install than grass.
    2. Bit looks more attractive than grass.
    3. Cit can be used far more often than grass.
    4. Dit is safer for young children.
    Show the answer and why

    Answer C: it can be used far more often than grass. "A turf field can be played on from morning to night... Okonkwo estimates that turf would roughly triple the available playing hours."

    • AGoes further than the textShe says turf saves money each year on watering and mowing. She never says it is cheaper to install.
    • BNot in the textLooks are never discussed.
    • Correct optionit can be used far more often than grass.
    • DRight idea, wrong personSafety for children is Voss's topic, and Voss says turf is less safe.
  2. 11.According to Okonkwo, turf would also ...

    1. Areduce water and maintenance costs.
    2. Battract professional teams to the town.
    3. Cremove the need for coaches.
    4. Dincrease the town's tax revenue.
    Show the answer and why

    Answer A: reduce water and maintenance costs. "Turf requires no watering, mowing, or fertilizer, which she says would save the town thousands of dollars a year and conserve water."

    • Correct optionreduce water and maintenance costs.
    • BNot in the textOnly youth teams are mentioned.
    • CNot in the textCoaches appear only as Ravi Mehta. Nobody suggests removing them.
    • DGoes further than the textSaving money is not the same as raising revenue.
  3. 12.Helen Voss's main concern is that turf ...

    1. Ais disliked by most players.
    2. Bis too difficult to install.
    3. Ccannot be used in the rain.
    4. Dcreates new environmental and safety problems.
    Show the answer and why

    Answer D: creates new environmental and safety problems. Voss says the plan "trades one problem for several new ones": heat that can burn hands, rubber pellets in creeks, and replacement costs.

    • ANot in the textNobody says players dislike turf. Mehta says his players would love it.
    • BNot in the textInstallation difficulty never comes up.
    • CThe text says the oppositeTurf can be used "in almost any weather". The wet-weather problem belongs to grass.
    • Correct optioncreates new environmental and safety problems.
  4. 13.Okonkwo responds to the environmental criticism by saying that ...

    1. Athe creeks are already polluted anyway.
    2. BVoss is exaggerating the heat problem.
    3. Ctoday's infill materials are cleaner than older ones.
    4. Dthe town can no longer afford to maintain grass.
    Show the answer and why

    Answer C: today's infill materials are cleaner than older ones. "Okonkwo counters that modern infill materials are far cleaner than the recycled-tire crumb used a decade ago."

    • ANot in the textShe never says the creeks are already polluted.
    • BNot in the textShe doesn't respond to the heat point at all. Her answer is about infill.
    • Correct optiontoday's infill materials are cleaner than older ones.
    • DGoes further than the textShe argues drainage won't solve capacity, not that the town can't afford grass.
  5. 14.Ravi Mehta's position is best described as ...

    1. Asympathetic to both sides of the debate.
    2. Bfirmly opposed to the turf plan.
    3. Cconcerned only with the cost.
    4. Didentical to Voss's.
    Show the answer and why

    Answer A: sympathetic to both sides of the debate. "Sees merit on both sides... My players would love a field that is always open, but I do wonder what we are putting under their feet."

    • Correct optionsympathetic to both sides of the debate.
    • BThe text says the oppositeHe likes that turf would always be open.
    • CNot in the textHe never mentions money.
    • DGoes further than the textHe shares one of Voss's worries, but he also sees Okonkwo's point, so his view isn't the same as hers.
  6. 15.Blank 6 in the reader's comment

    1. Anever need any repair
    2. Bare cheaper than turf
    3. Cattract more players
    4. Dbecome unusable in wet weather
    Show the answer and why

    Answer D: become unusable in wet weather. The comment's next words prove it: "I've closed plenty of them after a wet spring." Okonkwo said wet fields close for weeks.

    • AThe text says the oppositeVoss says grass "repairs itself", but the commenter is agreeing with Okonkwo here, who says grass wears out.
    • BNot in the textCost has nothing to do with the closures that follow in the sentence.
    • CThe text says the oppositeOverused fields are already too popular. That is Okonkwo's problem.
    • Correct optionbecome unusable in wet weather
  7. 16.Blank 7 in the reader's comment

    1. Acold to the touch
    2. Bdangerously hot
    3. Cslightly damp
    4. Dunusually crowded
    Show the answer and why

    Answer B: dangerously hot. It backs up Voss's worry about heat, "no exaggeration", on "a July afternoon." She said turf can burn a child's hands.

    • AThe text says the oppositeJuly and a heat worry point to hot, not cold.
    • Correct optiondangerously hot
    • CNot in the textDamp has nothing to do with Voss's heat worry.
    • DTrue, but answers a different questionCrowding is a real issue in the article, but this sentence is about heat.
  8. 17.Blank 8 in the reader's comment

    1. Aa minor issue
    2. Ban all-or-nothing choice
    3. Ca purely financial matter
    4. Da decision already made
    Show the answer and why

    Answer B: an all-or-nothing choice. The next sentence says the answer "depends on the individual field", so the mistake is treating it as one choice for every field.

    • AThe text says the oppositeHe says the debate has merit on both sides, so he isn't calling it minor.
    • Correct optionan all-or-nothing choice
    • CTrue, but answers a different questionMoney comes up in the article, but his complaint is about every field getting the same answer.
    • DThe text says the oppositeThe council hasn't voted. A consultation comes first.
  9. 18.Blank 9 in the reader's comment

    1. Astart with a single trial field
    2. Bresurface every field in the park
    3. Cleave the decision to the coaches
    4. Dpostpone the vote until next spring
    Show the answer and why

    Answer A: start with a single trial field. "Rather than commit to one surface everywhere" needs a small, field-by-field step. A single trial field is that step.

    • Correct optionstart with a single trial field
    • BThe text says the oppositeThat is committing to one surface everywhere, exactly what he warns against.
    • CNot in the textCoaches deciding is never suggested.
    • DSame words, different meaningThe vote is already set for spring. Postponing it doesn't give any field-by-field information.
  10. 19.Blank 10 in the reader's comment

    1. Asave all the money
    2. Bplease everyone at once
    3. Cavoid holding a vote
    4. Dlearn from real results
    Show the answer and why

    Answer D: learn from real results. "Instead of simply guessing" needs the opposite of guessing. A trial field gives them real results to learn from.

    • AGoes further than the textA trial still costs money. It avoids "spending a fortune", not all spending.
    • BNot in the textHe never claims a trial would please everyone.
    • CThe text says the oppositeThe council will still vote. A trial informs the vote.
    • Correct optionlearn from real results

Keep an error log, not a score

After each practice set, write one row per miss. The proof column matters most: if you can't point to a sentence, you guessed right, and the same trap will catch you next time. After a week, count the trap column. That count tells you what to practise.

QuestionYou pickedAnswerThe proofTrap
Question 6CEC says the bird "rebounded sufficiently" to leave the endangered list. Nothing says there are more birds than before the decline.Goes further than the text
Question 7DED has webcams and D has pigeons, but no scientist studies diet with the webcams.Same words, different meaning
Question 10ACOkonkwo says turf saves money every year on upkeep. She never says it's cheaper to install. Her main point is playing hours.Goes further than the text

What to practise next

Drill the part your error log points to in reading practice by part. The first drill in every part is free. To see how your raw score maps to a level, use the CELPIP reading score chart.

Getting from 7 to 9 in CELPIP reading

How many questions do I need right for CELPIP Reading 9?

CELPIP doesn't publish exact cut-offs, and they move a little between tests. Our reading score chart puts level 9 at about 31 to 33 correct out of 38, and level 7 at about 24 to 28. So going from 7 to 9 means three to seven more correct answers, depending on where in the 7 range you are now.

Why do I keep getting stuck at 7?

At 7 you usually understand the passage. The points go on questions where two options both look supported. Part 3's "not given" answers and Part 4's "who said it" questions are built for that. From what we've seen, the fix is learning to name the trap in each wrong option, so you rule it out with a reason instead of a feeling.

Are these real CELPIP questions?

No. They are from our free Reading Exam 1, written to match the official format and difficulty. Official CELPIP material isn't free to republish.

Should I take the full test first?

If you want an honest score, yes. Reading Exam 1 is free as a timed mock with an estimated CELPIP level at the end. This page uses its Parts 3 and 4, so take the mock before you read the answers.